[BladeBryan]

SatinDoll wrote: “This whole effort to place a usurper in the White House has been in the works for sometime.”

Whether or not it was the conspiracy you imagine, the CRS report does recognize the time scale: “the eligibility of native born U.S. citizens has been settled law for more than a century”.

What’s more, in our time there were no advocates for the theory that a native-born citizen’s eligibility depends upon the citizenship of his parents. Of course that changed in 2008, when a certain faction wanted reasons to argue that Barack Obama cannot be president.

[SatinDoll]

You’re full of crap. Jack Haskell is a traitor who has worked to undermine this government and collapse it from within, just like the others who’ve been a part of this un-American effort.

The Democratic Party sent a Congressional Rep to Jakarta to spread around money, buying up all government documents and Soetoro photos - July 2007. Hell, Obama left there as a ten year old; if he was truly born in Hawaii, what could possibly be damageing enough to hide in Indonesia?

Obama himself sent a million dollars to his “cousin”, supposedly to help that man’s election effort to be President of Kenya. That failed, but it was a good cover for terrorizing the Christian ministries and murdering off missionaries who knew EVERYTHING about BHO2’s past, and where he was really born.

“What’s more, in our time there were no advocates for the theory that a native-born citizen’s eligibility depends upon the citizenship of his parents.”

Typical communist lie, repeated often enough so you and your comrades hope it will drown out truth - like the Justia.com surgical removal of Minor v. Happersett from 25 Supreme Court Opinions in the run up to the 2008 election.

Truth is the daughter of time, Bryan. You and your comrades are running out of that commodity.

[DiogenesLamp]

Whether or not it was the conspiracy you imagine, the CRS report does recognize the time scale: “the eligibility of native born U.S. citizens has been settled law for more than a century”.

What’s more, in our time there were no advocates for the theory that a native-born citizen’s eligibility depends upon the citizenship of his parents. Of course that changed in 2008, when a certain faction wanted reasons to argue that Barack Obama cannot be president.

Given that I have repeatedly posted the following which completely disproves your statement, I can only come to the conclusion that you are LYING when you say that.

1916:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29744612/Breckinridge-Long-A-Natural-Born-Citizen-Within

1884:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18450082/Arthur-Hinman-How-a-British-Subject-Became-President-of-the-United-States

At this point, I will remember you have definitely been notified as to the untruth of your statement. Should you make it again, I am going to call you a liar, and I am going to link my comments back to this post where you were notified once again that this issue has a long history, and is not the result of people picking on poor little idiot Barack.

And just for good measure, we'll throw in the Boston Globe, 1896.