Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kearnyirish2

I think a better way to regard the Japanese Army is that, of all the participants in World War II, they were the only one that had not learned the lessons of World War I. On many levels, from their rifles to their uniforms and tactics, they were reminiscent of a pre-1914 European army.


45 posted on 11/29/2011 8:41:26 PM PST by M1903A1 ("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy... and call it progress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: M1903A1

“I think a better way to regard the Japanese Army is that, of all the participants in World War II, they were the only one that had not learned the lessons of World War I.”

The early success against the Americans in the Philippines and the British in Singapore indicate that they had evolved since WWI, but they just “plateaued” in 1941. Few new weapons or tactics, just more of the same; they’d been fighting in China for years at that point, and decided to stick with what worked in 1937.


51 posted on 11/30/2011 2:30:01 AM PST by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson