A complete shell fish hook from the Pleistocene levels of a cave site at the east end of Timor (Image: Susan O'Conner)

Incomplete fish hook from Jerimalai shelter dated to around 11,000 years ago (Image: Susan O'Conner)

1 posted on
11/27/2011 1:20:30 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
To: SunkenCiv
I’ve gone tuna fishing several times. I am amazed that this could be done with just a hook. They dive really low and it certainly is a fight to get them to the surface with a sport rod/reel/fighting chair.
To: SunkenCiv
I’d like to see anybody catch a tuna with THAT.
To: SunkenCiv

and they used exactly what for line???
6 posted on
11/27/2011 2:05:33 PM PST by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: SunkenCiv
14 posted on
11/27/2011 2:36:43 PM PST by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: SunkenCiv
So....for 42,000 years, men have had to act like they really really enjoy their wives tuna casserole.
17 posted on
11/27/2011 2:50:45 PM PST by
digger48
To: SunkenCiv
No hole or ridges used to wrap a line through. I'm not buying the hook, line or sinker theory. Most likely those are earrings or nose rings.

20 posted on
11/27/2011 3:47:38 PM PST by
bgill
(The Obama administration is staging a coup. Wake up, America, before it's too late.)
To: SunkenCiv
If I grew up in New York City and had never before been fishing or had my bare feet touch grass, I might believe this story.
21 posted on
11/27/2011 4:45:12 PM PST by
fso301
To: SunkenCiv
To: SunkenCiv
Cave painting circa 40,000 BC:

To: SunkenCiv
Could early man tune a piano before they could tuna fish?
(Come on, folks. We have to keep this thread alive).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson