*********************************EXCERPTS*******************************************
The National Research Council released the final report in the America's Climate Choices series on May 12, 2011. The public was invited to participate in a special event later that day -- A Conversation on America's Climate Choices, followed by a question-and-answer period and a reception.
Climate Central's Heidi Cullen hosted the conversation with several members of the report's authoring committee, including the Chair of the committee, Al Carnesale, University of California Los Angeles, and the Vice Chair, Bill Chameides, Duke University.
Other participants included:
Marilyn Brown, Georgia Institute of Technology
Donald Boesch, University of Maryland
Thomas Dietz, Michigan State University
Jim Geringer, Environmental Systems Research Institute
Philip R. Sharp, Resources for the Future
Robert Socolow, Princeton University
![]() |
![]() Advancing the Science of Climate Change |
![]() Limiting the Magnitude of Climate Change |
![]() Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change |
![]() Informing an Effective Response to Climate Change |
**************************************EXCERPT*************************************
Peter Miller says:
Not totally relevant, but if you want to read a lot of vindictive nonsense on the subject, you need to read the comments at Real Climate. Here is one from Anthonys greatest fan Tamino, I thought it was very revealing about the depth of thought in the AGW cult. I promise I did not make this up, its real:
Fake skeptics like Anthony Watts try to blame global warming on bad station siting. Turns out he was wrong.
Then they try to blame it on dropout of reporting stations. Turns out that was wrong.
The fake skeptics can hardly contain their worship for a new team to estimate temperature (the Berkeley team) which is started by a skeptic. Theyre sure the new estimate will prove that the other estimates are fraudulent. Anthony Watts proclaims that hell accept whatever their results are, even if it contradicts him. It contradicts him. He refuses to accept their results. He launches into multiple tirades to discredit the new effort.
Fake skeptics try to blame global warming on UHI. Turns out they were wrong.
Fake skeptics try to claim global warming has paused or slowed down or isnt even happening. Turns out they were wrong.
Scoundrels resort to stealing a bunch of private emails and take them out of context so they can launch a campaign of character assassination. Multiple investigations follow, the science of global warming is vindicated. Again.
The fake skeptics have got nothing. Zero. Zip. Squat. With all the real science against them, apparently their only recourse is to look for sloppy seconds in the stolen emails in a lame attempt to revive their smear campaign. It tells us all we need to know about the so-called skeptics. They are pathetic.
Im tempted to laugh but the health, safety, even survival of the next generation is at stake. Theyll know who it was who sealed their fate.
Comment by tamino 22 Nov 2011 @ 7:03 PM