Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All
A Conversation on America's Climate Choices

*********************************EXCERPTS*******************************************

The National Research Council released the final report in the America's Climate Choices series on May 12, 2011. The public was invited to participate in a special event later that day -- A Conversation on America's Climate Choices, followed by a question-and-answer period and a reception.

Climate Central's Heidi Cullen hosted the conversation with several members of the report's authoring committee, including the Chair of the committee, Al Carnesale, University of California Los Angeles, and the Vice Chair, Bill Chameides, Duke University.

Other participants included:

Marilyn Brown, Georgia Institute of Technology
Donald Boesch, University of Maryland
Thomas Dietz, Michigan State University
Jim Geringer, Environmental Systems Research Institute
Philip R. Sharp, Resources for the Future
Robert Socolow, Princeton University



America's Climate Choices Final Report

ACC Report Cover

May 12: The National Research Council has released the final report of America's Climate Choices. The report is available now through the National Academies Press. It includes a CD of the four panel reports of the America's Climate Choices series as well as materials based on those reports.

Several members of the report's authoring committee discussed will discuss the findings in A Conversation on America's Climate Choices on May 12 (see details below).

The report finds that the significant risks that climate change poses to human society and the environment provide a strong motivation to move ahead with substantial response efforts. Current efforts of local, state, and private sector actors are important, but not likely to yield progress comparable to what could be achieved with the addition of strong federal policies that establish coherent national goals and incentives, and that promote strong U.S. engagement in international-level response efforts. The inherent complexities and uncertainties of climate change are best met by applying an iterative risk management framework and making efforts to: significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions; prepare for adapting to impacts; invest in scientific research, technology development, and information systems; and facilitate engagement between scientific and technical experts and the many types of stakeholders making America's climate choices.

Press Release
Report in Brief (pdf)
Key findings from the report (pdf)



If your organization has an important forum or event where you'd like to hear more about the America's Climate Choices studies from the reports' authors, please contact Nancy Huddleston at 202-334-1260.

For media inquiries, email the National Academies' Office of News and Public Information at news@nas.edu or call 202-334-2138.



Advancing the Science of Climate Change

Limiting the Magnitude of Climate Change

Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change


Informing an Effective Response to Climate Change

5 posted on 11/26/2011 1:28:01 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: All
More from the comments at WUWT to the article:

**************************************EXCERPT*************************************

Peter Miller says:

November 25, 2011 at 3:23 pm

Not totally relevant, but if you want to read a lot of vindictive nonsense on the subject, you need to read the comments at Real Climate. Here is one from Anthony’s greatest fan Tamino, I thought it was very revealing about the depth of thought in the AGW cult. I promise I did not make this up, it’s real:

“Fake skeptics like Anthony Watts try to blame global warming on bad station siting. Turns out he was wrong.

Then they try to blame it on dropout of reporting stations. Turns out that was wrong.

The fake skeptics can hardly contain their worship for a new team to estimate temperature (the Berkeley team) which is started by a skeptic. They’re sure the new estimate will prove that the other estimates are fraudulent. Anthony Watts proclaims that he’ll accept whatever their results are, even if it contradicts him. It contradicts him. He refuses to accept their results. He launches into multiple tirades to discredit the new effort.

Fake skeptics try to blame global warming on UHI. Turns out they were wrong.

Fake skeptics try to claim global warming has “paused” or “slowed down” or isn’t even happening. Turns out they were wrong.

Scoundrels resort to stealing a bunch of private emails and take them out of context so they can launch a campaign of character assassination. Multiple investigations follow, the science of global warming is vindicated. Again.

The fake skeptics have got nothing. Zero. Zip. Squat. With all the real science against them, apparently their only recourse is to look for “sloppy seconds” in the stolen emails in a lame attempt to revive their smear campaign. It tells us all we need to know about the so-called “skeptics.” They are pathetic.

I’m tempted to laugh — but the health, safety, even survival of the next generation is at stake. They’ll know who it was who sealed their fate.”

Comment by tamino — 22 Nov 2011 @ 7:03 PM

6 posted on 11/26/2011 1:37:47 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson