Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Homer_J_Simpson
This time frame was a critical turning point in the war. If Hitler, instead of launching Barbarossa, had devoted his troops to throwing the allies out of North Africa completely, which he could have done, the war would have gone very differently.

The millions of troops he sent eastward to Russia would have easily destroyed the allies as a fighting force in Africa, probably knocking Britain out of the fighting. Churchill said as much to Roosevelt. That is how important the often underplayed African campaign was to the overall war effort.

Hitler's obsession with Russia, which cost him millions of troops and weaponry, was a fatal flaw which enabled the allies to prevail in Africa and defeat the Axis Powers' hopes of ultimate victory in Europe.

6 posted on 11/26/2011 7:36:47 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hinckley buzzard
Hitler's obsession with Russia, which cost him millions of troops and weaponry, was a fatal flaw which enabled the allies to prevail in Africa and defeat the Axis Powers' hopes of ultimate victory in Europe.

Hitler didn't have much of a choice, he had to attack Russia before Russia became powerful enough to launch an offensive strike of their own, which would have probably happened by 1943. That's why Stalin tried not to provoke Hitler until then, even when he suspected the Nazis would strike in 1941.

7 posted on 11/26/2011 7:42:45 AM PST by dfwgator (I stand with Herman Cain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson