Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

WTF ?!!!

Brucellosis in (an already decimated population) of native bison came via exposure to range cattle introduced from Europe, not “dairy cows” !

Until the introduction of the horse by the Spaniards circa 1500 A.D., the plains Amerin populations were little more than footsore scavengers trailing beind the annual migrations of the “big herd” of bison. While the horse changed all of this it didn’t change the culture from “hunter/gatherer”, to husbandry ! Perhaps, in time the Amerin culture might have changed, but time didn’t permit !

Regardless, IMO, isolating a population of bison by declaring it a “historcial artifact” is contravening known genetic laws. Seems far better, IMO to innoculate the population and make them available for general distrubtion to other herds to enhance the genetic diversity ! >PS


22 posted on 11/23/2011 8:01:31 PM PST by PiperShade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: PiperShade
What are you talking about?

I didn't raise the issue of dairy cows, someone else did. GO back through the thread and figure out what was said ~ because I was responding to that ~ not to history.

24 posted on 11/24/2011 4:08:10 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson