Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Daffynition

How about the Government stop providing food at schools, altogether, and let parents decide what their children can and cannot eat. I don’t think that the problem here is that the Government has decided not to provide chocolate milk in lunches, but that the Government is providing lunches, AT ALL.


2 posted on 11/19/2011 3:59:35 AM PST by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JDW11235

absolutely!


10 posted on 11/19/2011 4:42:37 AM PST by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: JDW11235
How about the Government stop providing food at schools, altogether, and let parents decide what their children can and cannot eat.

Reasons:

1) Parents are incompetent and would allow their children to have things liberals deem as "poor choices"

2) Poor children would have no food whatsoever and die in our streets of starvation

3) How will liberals enrich themselves without lucrative catering contracts with the gov't?

16 posted on 11/19/2011 5:25:41 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: JDW11235

“How about the Government stop providing food at schools, altogether, and let parents decide what their children can and cannot eat.”

Never happen because its essentially govt welfare for farmers who can dispose of excess crop capacity / prop up wholesale prices.


21 posted on 11/19/2011 6:51:49 AM PST by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson