Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: smokingfrog

STAR TREK (The TV show)was so bad you can tell it was made on the cheap!

I was only able to set through one full show about a machine that ate planets. The others were terrible!

STAR WARS was much better but too many people have become way too enamored with it. I could not set through the later 1990s versions as they were so awful.


8 posted on 11/18/2011 10:06:22 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
STAR TREK (The TV show)was so bad you can tell it was made on the cheap! I was only able to set through one full show about a machine that ate planets. The others were terrible!

Take a look at those episodes today. They've been remastered in HD with all new CGI special effects. Aside from the uniforms, nothing looks cheap anymore.

11 posted on 11/18/2011 10:10:33 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

In the late 1960’s when it came out it was pretty good!


41 posted on 11/18/2011 10:29:54 PM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

I think the original Star Trek (the 1960s series) was light years better than anything ever made regarding Sci-fi and here’s why: It forced the audience to use it’s imagination which will aways trump the greatest special effects and the greatest attention to detail. It was a low budget show that reused a lot of effects and props (even music) which worked in it’s favor making it more surreal. If you took it literally it was a joke. Kirk and Spock dressed as Nazis or gangsters or seeing the Alice in wonderland bunny on a planet. But that is what made it great. Life in outerspace is the unknown and it made your imagination fly rather than limit you with sharp definitions. Star Wars is more a Pirate movie and don’t even get me started on Star trek the Next Generation which I like to call Star Trek the anal retentive politically correct version. That show got me so nauseous when it first came out I half expected Picard to start licking Number twos crack hole which is why they probably called him number two. I mean my God, they even had a shrink on the bridge. WTF?


136 posted on 11/18/2011 11:51:25 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (Nancy Pelosi - The #1 reason why we need a Constitutional amendment for Congressional drug testing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

I think the original Star Trek (the 1960s series) was light years better than anything ever made regarding Sci-fi and here’s why: It forced the audience to use it’s imagination which will aways trump the greatest special effects and the greatest attention to detail. It was a low budget show that reused a lot of effects and props (even music) which worked in it’s favor making it more surreal. If you took it literally it was a joke. Kirk and Spock dressed as Nazis or gangsters or seeing the Alice in wonderland bunny on a planet. But that is what made it great. Life in outerspace is the unknown and it made your imagination fly rather than limit you with sharp definitions. Star Wars is more a Pirate movie and don’t even get me started on Star trek the Next Generation which I like to call Star Trek the anal retentive politically correct version. That show got me so nauseous when it first came out I half expected Picard to start licking Number twos crack hole which is why they probably called him number two. I mean my God, they even had a shrink on the bridge. WTF?


137 posted on 11/18/2011 11:51:37 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (Nancy Pelosi - The #1 reason why we need a Constitutional amendment for Congressional drug testing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson