[AAABEST]

As for the Mustangs, I can’t imagine why anyone would find those appealing. Yes, they look good, and are quick in a straight line. But with a solid axle rear suspension, they are laughable in the corners. I cannot understand why the car magazine in question would possibly give them any great review. Again, while I won’t be giving money to Government Motors, the Camaro is pretty clearly a better performance platform.

One reason that I can see why you "can't imagine" and "cannot understand" things is because you don't bother to read what's posted right in front of you.

As far as Laguna Seca track times go (i.e. CORNERING), the BOSS is not only far outpacing everything in its class, it's besting cars that are multiple times its sticker price - Porcshe, the M3, Vettes, Mercedes AMG, even the V12 Aston Martin.

Laguna Seca track times are posted above. LS is one of the toughest proving grounds for handling available, which is why it's looked to as a benchmark. Here's what the track looks like:

As far as the Camaro goes, depsite the fact that the Camaro runs a 6.2 liter engine compared to the 5.0 liter engine in the BOSS, the BOSS literally destroys it in every manner, 1/4 mile, 0-60, 1 mile straight drag and lap times on every track where both have run.

[RoadTest]

That was a pretty good commercial.