None of your links show that Breitbart supports the homosexual agenda
If you can prove different, give it your best shot.
As far as we know.
Speak for your self.
He does not post here at this time. Don't include others in your ignorance of that fact by stating as far as WE know.
If you didn't dislike him, I don't imagine you would be vilifying him so emphatically.
You are doing more than having concerns about him.
You are throwing him under the bus.
Have all the concerns you want but get your facts straight, and if you are going to make accusations against anyone show some proof.
...Its right in line with our founders boycott of CPAC...
Who are "our" founders?
None of your links show that Breitbart supports the homosexual agenda
Its your opinion. My opinion is that by joining the board of GOProud, promoting GOProud, and trying to force conservatives and CPAC to accept GOProud IS pushing the homosexual agenda.
"As far as we know". Speak for your self. He does not post here at this time. Don't include others in your ignorance of that fact by stating as far as WE know.
We do not know if he posts here or not. Even if you were somehow personally connected to him, you still wouldn't know for sure. Using your own words: "If you can prove different, give it your best shot."
"If you didn't dislike him, I don't imagine you would be vilifying him so emphatically."
Linking to his own words is vilifying? Criticizing his promotion of GOProud is doing so "emphatically"?
"You are doing more than having concerns about him. You are throwing him under the bus."
I have concerns about Newt, Cain, and Perry too. When they say or support something I disagree with, I say so.
"Have all the concerns you want but get your facts straight, and if you are going to make accusations against anyone show some proof."
Did you need more than the 3 links I provided to show his support for GOProud and their inclusion at CPAC?
"...Its right in line with our founders boycott of CPAC... Who are "our" founders?"
Pardon my leaving out the apostrophe. It should have read "our founder's boycott"...As to who he is, I think post 155 will explain it better than I can.