Posted on 11/12/2011 4:14:36 PM PST by Libloather
Jerry Sandusky will be found innocent
Letter to the Editor
Updated: 11/09/2011 12:37:09 PM EST
I have to say I find the accusations against Jerry Sandusky very hard to believe. I have met and know Jerry through The Second Mile. Both of my daughters were a part of the Second Mile program, and it is a great program for kids. I would have never hesitated one minute to allow Jerry to be with my children.
He is being judged in the court of opinions. This man is innocent. I support Jerry 100 percent. I also ask that people please do not judge the Second Mile program. They are a great organization for at-risk children. The adults who run this program are the best counselors available. My children learned so many valuable things by participating in the programs offered.
Again, knowing Jerry Sandusky, I find it very hard to believe that he ever hurt any child that was in his company. Please stop judging him and let our justice system work. I think that when all is out and said and done Jerry will be found innocent of all of this.
DIANN BISHOP
MANCHESTER
well stated...we don’t even know some of the evil among us...
......several questions demand answers: (1) Who granted Sandusky emeritus status after he retired in 1998? (2) Did Spanier and the Trustees approve his tenure? (3) Sanduskys tenure gave him the keys to the locker room...and free rein to commit atrocities on young young boys in the PS showers........
Its a mistake not to connect ex-PS Pres Graham Spanier and Sandusky. These are two very calculated predatorsthey did not operate in a vacuum. They were very calculated in everything they did.
NOTE Graham Spanier was fired from the PS presidents job........but he and his wife are still on the PS payroll as profs. Hmmmmmm.....looks like ol Graham used leverage to stay on the payroll. Betcha wife-swappin gay lovin Graham has some mighty interesting stories to tell.
Ex-PS president Graham Spaniers activities at Penn State (see more below) answers the one question on everyones mindhow did Sandusky got free rein in the PS showers with young boys? Did Spanier participate, as well? He certainly had an obsession with pederasty and moved hell and high water to give gay sex a foothold in PS.
MUST READ REFERENCE Paterno is getting the most attention, but FREEPER PA BOOKENDS posted this WRT Graham Spanier, the President who was also fired.
Spaniers degrees are in sociology with a chosen emphasis on human sexuality wife swapping, adolescent sex, etc. Spanier asserted he wanted to make PSU the most LGBT-friendly school in the country. Spaniers sponsorship gave Penn State the first gay fraternity in the nation. Under Spaniers leadership, Penn State sponsored the Tent of Consent - all about gay sex, as well as C*ntfest (shocker).
Now, shortly after his arrival, Spanier tried to get rid of the legendary Paterno. Why? The football program was bringing in tons of money. Paterno was (and remained) one of the LOWEST paid college coaches in the country. M/M Paterno donated millions to the University. Spanier lost the battle, but one has to ask: why was Spanier so eager to get rid of Joe??
It becomes clearer and clearer why Spanier was out to ditch Paterno-Spanier had to remove any and all obstacles in his path to solidifying Penn State as a protected pedophilia haven for Sandusky (and whoever else was involved in these heinous activities).
Now isnt that interesting-Spanier was approved for the presidents job DESPITE recommendations against it by those who knew of his push to normalize homosexuality. Those who voted to approve Spanier should also be investigatedthey are in deep, deep doo-doo. What did Spanier offer for a vote to approve him for the job?
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
What part of Jerry Sandusky being seen in a shower with his penis in the anus of a 10 year old do you not understand Diann?
The jury has to suppose that, we are not under that obligation.
Yes, until a jury decides, we need to keep an open mind. Mrs. Bishop could be right about Sandusky, and Sheila Jackson Lee could be right that Neil Armstrong planted the U.S. flag on Mars.
Except for there was a witness and he seems to prefer little boys.....
Innocent until proven guilty is for the courtroom. Outside the courtroom we the public are allowed to voice our opinions based on the facts we know or do not know. Its called our freedom of speech.
She can’t even write properly. She certainly cannot reason adequately enough to understand why her daughters were never in danger from a homosexual predator. Unless they happened to see or learn of Sandusky assaulting a boy. Then they might have ended up in protective custody due to death threats from their neighbors; suffering from dementia; or dead, with their computer in the river.
The evidence is mounting that this area of the country is profoundly disturbed. Is it inbred? Sandusky is never going to be “found innocent” - why headline even an opinion piece with that gaffe? But with “people” like this on a jury, who would hand their children back to Sandusky, I can’t rule out that he’ll be found not guilty.
BTW, cult seems to be a term used to justify an increasingly common
phenomenon: a lack of moral clarity and personal courage.
Yes, per Victim 4, Sandusky retired after his 1999 meeting with Paterno, in which Paterno told Sandusky that he would not become Head Coach after Paterno. That meeting followed the 1998 accusations and investigation that was mysteriously stopped.
So the currently available evidence indicates that Paterno has known about Sandusky for at least 13 years. 9 years ago, Paterno and the administration learned of the rape. And Sandusky had access to the facilities until one week ago. I’m surprised there the PSU officials aren’t being charged as accessories to the crimes.
I think I hear Rush say that Joe Paterno has been a big Republican campaign contributor. That would be reason enough for the Democrats to make up lies about him and his staff.
heard
Absolutely. One instance of folks trying to convince the public otherwise was the old gang of Clinton Cronies. But, you are right and they were wrong, as are some posting here.
Because the homosexual Jerry didn’t rape her daughters, then he raped no one. blech!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.