[ExtremeUnction]

He protected a child rapist. If you still like Joe then maybe you’re a bad man.

[John Valentine]

He protected a child rapist.

BS. Paterno did nothing of the kind. Based on the word of an self-professed witness (Paterno himself had NO direct knowledge), he reported what he had been told to the responsible officials at the University, as he was required to do.

It was then up to PSU officials to act. They did not. Is that Paterno's fault?

Or, the actual witness could have or I might say SHOULD have reported what he saw with his own eyes (no hearsay) to the police. He did not. Is that Paterno's fault too?

[Rational Thought]

He protected a child rapist.

Question.

If what you state is true (which it might be), why didn't the Grand Jury indict Paterno?