To: bananaman22
Please remember, this article is from a site that encourages as much petroleum consumption as possible.
2 posted on
11/03/2011 10:19:23 AM PDT by
MindBender26
(Forget AMEX. Remember your Glock 27: Never Leave Home Without It!)
3 posted on
11/03/2011 10:20:30 AM PDT by
Darksheare
(You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
To: bananaman22
Needless to say, in the aftermath of the disaster, both TEPCO and the Japanese government were at pains to minimize the disasters consequences....Not just those two. Correct me if I'm wrong, but NBC and MSNBC haven't been running with a lot of coverage on this story. Gee, I wonder why....
4 posted on
11/03/2011 10:25:04 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Forget a third party. We need a second one.)
To: bananaman22
Japans six reactor Fukushima Daichi nuclear complex has inadvertently become the worlds bell-weather poster child for the inherent risks of nuclear power Not really "inherent risks". First, the plant is a very old design -- most modern plants couldn't have the same problem. Second, there was the basic flaw of location, which allowed their desiel generators to be flooded, knocking out the backup systems.
Third, there were problems with the management at the plant, problems that are not "inherent" in nuclear power, although some of the problems may be inherent in the japaneese culture.
To: bananaman22
Cesium is not an issue. Half of what it has been released has a relatively short half life, 5 years, and the Pacific is a very big ocean in which the rest will be dispersed.
7 posted on
11/03/2011 11:08:41 AM PDT by
J Aguilar
(Fiat Justitia et ruat coelum)
To: bananaman22
I will NB that there is no URL or link to the actual report...
11 posted on
11/03/2011 12:01:57 PM PDT by
NVDave
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson