Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pharmboy
I thought he was suspected and when finally captured with documents, he denied his name.

The British were going to convey him elsewhere either for trial or incarceration when spectators immediately recognized him and called to him. He was hanged there and then as a spy... and without a trial.

BTW I am not a sir.

12 posted on 11/02/2011 11:09:25 AM PDT by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: SMARTY
My humble apologies, Madame...

There are a few stories about Hale's capture, the one involving Rogers is often cited by historians, but I have seen others similar to what you relate. The following is from wiki:

An account of Nathan Hale's capture was written by Consider Tiffany, a Connecticut shopkeeper and Loyalist, and obtained by the Library of Congress. In Tiffany's account, Major Robert Rogers of the Queen's Rangers saw Hale in a tavern and recognized him despite his disguise. After luring Hale into betraying himself by pretending to be a patriot himself, Rogers and his Rangers apprehended Hale near Flushing Bay, in Queens, New York.[6] Another story was that his Loyalist cousin, Samuel Hale, was the one who revealed his true identity.

13 posted on 11/02/2011 11:14:41 AM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson