Let’s see, the very fact that liberals make an accusation of a black conservative is evidence that he is innocent.
No, not going to go there.
However, I will agree that a liberal who exonerated Clinton has no business attacking anybody, whatever color, whatever political persuasion, for which there is no suspicion of anything less than that guy. But, I have the problem of being consistent.
What?
I never made any statement regarding Cain’s innocence. You are manufacturing that. My logic compares the treatment of a white man vs the treatment of two black men by Liberals. If all were supposed “equal” then the further inference would be all were guilty or all were innocent. Taking that assumptive leap, which is unwarranted, one is left with the logical conclusion that all are guilty because Clinton was guilty. There is no logical way that you can claim I stated that Cain was innocent.