Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NewinTexsas

I don’t think you read the 10/6 results very closely. There was far less water flow than that, and there was only one unit tested rather than all 50.

What else have you gotten wrong, hmmmm?


346 posted on 11/01/2011 11:12:40 AM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo
I don’t think you read the 10/6 results very closely. There was far less water flow than that, and there was only one unit tested rather than all 50. What else have you gotten wrong, hmmmm?

From the 10/6 data we have 0.18 l/s.

0.18 l/s * 60 s/min = 10.8 l/min.

10.8 l/min * 60 min/hr = 648 l/hr.

Sounds like someone on Rossi's team goofed!

349 posted on 11/01/2011 11:39:22 AM PDT by NewinTexsas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson