[ken21]

mark levin doesn’t agree with you.

[JOHN W K]

You mean Mark Levin doesn’t agree with our founding father’s expressed intentions and beliefs under which our Constitution was adopted?

JWK

Those who reject abiding by the intentions and beliefs under which our Constitution was agree to, [u]as those intentions and beliefs may be documented from historical records,[/u] wish to remove the anchor and rudder of our constitutional system so they may then be free to “interpret” the Constitution to mean whatever they wish it to mean.

[JOHN W K]

You mean Mark Levin doesn’t agree with our founding father’s expressed intentions and beliefs under which our Constitution was adopted?

JWK

Those who reject abiding by the intentions and beliefs under which our Constitution was agree to, [u]as those intentions and beliefs may be documented from historical records,[/u] wish to remove the anchor and rudder of our constitutional system so they may then be free to “interpret” the Constitution to mean whatever they wish it to mean.

[C. Edmund Wright]

The vanity poster thinks he knows more about the Constitution and federalism than Levin and Rush. What he is proving is that he knows less about the 999 plan than even David Gregory - which is to say, he doesn’t understand sh-t about it....