Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: svcw
It's about the intent of the Founders and their definition of natural born.

Somehow I don't envision that they would have wanted anyone with possible dual loyalties, as is the case with children born to parents who are not citizens.

Given the definition of some on this board, the twins born the American woman and the Mexican drug lord could grow up in Mexico, return to the U.S. as adults and then run for president. I think you would have a **hard** time selling that to the American voter.

The terrorist and U.S.-born Anwar al-Awlaki would have been eligible to run for president according to some on this board. Were his parents U.S. citizens? Was his sole citizenship to the U.S.?

152 posted on 10/23/2011 2:59:45 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: wintertime

The person running for president must be a citizen, 35 years of age and lived here 14 years.
anwar al-awlaki was not a citizen as he renounced his citizenship, as well as not meeting any of the other requirements.


156 posted on 10/23/2011 3:06:36 PM PDT by svcw (Those who are easily shocked... should be shocked more often. - Mae West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson