Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FritzG

At the time it was quite illegal. High treason, to be exact.

It also changed the world.


3 posted on 10/20/2011 12:11:18 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Retired Greyhound
Exactly, of course it was illegal at the time, I don't think any of the Founding Fathers believed otherwise.

When the Signers pledged their lives in support of the Declaration they did so because they knew they could be hung for treason.

12 posted on 10/20/2011 12:14:25 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Retired Greyhound
-- At the time it was quite illegal. High treason, to be exact. --

Indeed. Subversive of the established order, and radical by empowering the people over their government.

I think it was a once in humanity event, the results of which will be buried by those who write history.

49 posted on 10/20/2011 1:56:21 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Retired Greyhound
High treason, to be exact.

It was no such thing.

The King and the British Parliament BROKE the English constitution by usurping rights which belonged to the King's subjects residing in the American provinces with respect to the taking of their property without their consent.

What if the president of the United States sent a team into your home to confiscate your weapons in violation of the American constitution - would you consider your resisting that to be treason?

What if the president came into your home and tried to evict you from your property without due process of law in violation of the American constitution - would you consider your resisting that to be treason?

What if the president tried that with respect to everyone in your state - would it be treason if they collectively declared the constitution in breach and reformed a new government?

The King and the parliament in London had no right under the British constitution (which, although not contained in a single document, was well understood) to take the property of the Americans without the consent of their representative assemblies.

60 posted on 10/20/2011 3:19:52 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson