Unabashedly anti-Israel. Hard to argue that he isn’t pro Palestinian and pro Iranian. So much so that he reminds me of Jimmy Carter. there could be fresh bodies in the street from a mentally disabled suicide bomber tricked into martyrdom and both Carter & Paul couldn’t find a way to condemn the perps. I Suspect they both receive funding from those sources. I love what he has to say financially and constitutionally but that’s it. Could only vote fr him if it was him or Obama in the general. Hope he never makes it that far.
RP made the argument that it was OK for Iran to have nukes because they need them since Israel has them.
Rather than sticking to his (equally idiotic) concept of non-intervention, he chose to morally equate Israel ( a country that has established peace agreements with Arab countries Egypt and Jordan and exhibited a determination to establish peace in the region) with Iran (a country that has THREATENED not only Israel but also Arab countries Saudi Arabia and Iraq as well as sponsor INTERNATIONAL — not intra-regional — terrorism)
At the last debate he also argued against intl aid because of the example of our support of Egypt that is now likely to bite us in the butt. Again he equates a dictatorship with a Democracy.
This leads to the conclusion that RP is either stupid and naive or he can’t help but be anti-Israel.
Some might say he is consistent, but stubborn consistency in favor of common sense is IMHO no different than school districts that say “that’s our (zero-tolerance) policy”