Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kingu
So, you'd rather tax the housebound retirees in your community who never use the bridge.

Hmm.

Could be a serious problem selling that idea.

29 posted on 10/18/2011 7:54:48 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
So, you'd rather tax the housebound retirees in your community who never use the bridge.

Let's see, total US bridge maintenance budgets, divided by the number of people in the country, assume that the retirees are in a taxable bracket, carry the 1... Yep, my calculations indicate that a mere fraction of the taxed dollar goes to places and things they'd likely not use - bridges, public parks, etc. A big percentage goes to fund defense contractors, public union employees, and of course, the ultimate, those who think they're entitled to every single penny that couple has scrimped and slaved over to earn over the years.

Since I'm saying that bridge maintenance should be paid for from the gas taxes already collected, your strawman example shouldn't have to pay a dime for the bridge.

38 posted on 10/18/2011 8:18:53 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson