Skip to comments.
Perfect fossil could be most complete dinosaur ever
New Scientists ^
| 13 October 2011
| Jeff Hecht
Posted on 10/16/2011 7:07:25 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
To: SunkenCiv
How can I be “ dead wrong” when it’s my question that hasn’t been answered?it’s an odd grasp of logic you have when I can be dead wrong for asking a question.
61
posted on
10/17/2011 1:57:43 AM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
(Somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing an idiot)
To: SunkenCiv
I was taught to write for level of the group that would read the article.
The technical forum here on FR is the best place to have those kinds of discussions.
62
posted on
10/17/2011 6:29:24 AM PDT
by
mountainlion
(I am voting for Sarah after getting screwed again by the DC Thugs.)
To: mountainlion
I suggest starting a new thread with the other thread hijackers and trolls.
63
posted on
10/17/2011 6:08:32 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: muir_redwoods
My message was in response to this, from you:
> So you defer to an unnamed other authority and have no answer. Thanks
So, in other words, wrong again.
64
posted on
10/17/2011 6:32:04 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
Wrong again? When was I wrong the first time? When I asked a reasonable question about the illogic of assuming complexity requires design? Please try some consistency
65
posted on
10/18/2011 1:58:32 AM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
(Somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing an idiot)
To: muir_redwoods
You’re trying a straw man argument, and this is the second time — my response wasn’t to whatever drivel you posted during your thread hijack, and while it’s possible that you’re not understanding this, it’s just as likely that you’re lying.
66
posted on
10/18/2011 3:08:52 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
Ah, the ad hominem, now I’m a liar, I guess you’ve run out of anything useful to say. If you’re keeping score, it wasn’t I who mentioned a designer first, I simply took issue with the illogic of the respondent who did so I hijacked no thread. Careful reading is an important life skill; look into it.
67
posted on
10/18/2011 3:31:08 AM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
(Somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing an idiot)
To: SunkenCiv
Please realize that some consider the theory of evolution a religion. Others see it as unproven like global warming and open for attack like some attack religion. There is little common ground and people become quite polarized.
68
posted on
10/18/2011 7:05:43 AM PDT
by
mountainlion
(I am voting for Sarah after getting screwed again by the DC Thugs.)
To: mountainlion; SunkenCiv
Please realize that some consider the theory of evolution a religion.
So? Those people almost universally have no idea what they are talking about and are also accutely unaware that "insulting" science by calling it a religion mocks their own choice to follow a religion.
69
posted on
10/21/2011 1:44:24 PM PDT
by
whattajoke
(Let's keep Conservatism real.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson