Why wasn’t this bitch charged with perjury ?
The only reason I can think of is the fact that she was lying for her leftist masters.
I picture them asking her “Did he ever do anything sexist of abusive or tell an off-color joke or anything?”
Or it might have been even less obvious- “Tell me everything you can recall about Clarance Thomas”
And she related stories and jokes and “ok this one time he cam in an seemed agitated, looking at his drink and he said “There's a pubic hair on this can!”
Back in that time period it was for a while a common joke to say ‘pubic hair’ for many things including measurement (i.e. “Move that over - it's off by a c@#$ hair”)
The way the word boink used to be used for sex, and ‘ball’ was once a hard core word for sex... (seriously)
So the people searching for some dirt said “OMG HE SAID PUBIC HAIR?????”
And they ran with that. It was a giant ass circus all over the words “pubic hair”
And Anita was just too stupid to put a stop to it when they called her in to testify and say “hey- it was a joke!” (not that that would have stopped them)
This is how evil Democraps are. And in those days there was no FOX NEWS- the media ran with the story like it was the most evil thing they ever heard...