Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: csense

But then that would mean that Palin didn’t have a lot of support if she wasn’t hurting the others by not announcing.


133 posted on 10/10/2011 12:05:05 AM PDT by Politics4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: Politics4US
But then that would mean that Palin didn’t have a lot of support if she wasn’t hurting the others by not announcing.

You're engaging in a form of affirming the consequent here. You're basically saying that the candidates were hurt because of (deferred) support of Palin. Since the candidates weren't hurt, then Palin had no support.

I Would tend to think it's a bit more complicated than that.

146 posted on 10/10/2011 12:26:20 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson