Why don’t you google the prior articles on these killings, they’re educational. There’s no question this sow killed the first person and it’s DNA was found at the second scene.
You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to make the connection and it seems the Park Service made that connection, even though they refused to put the sow down after the first killing.
There is a great deal of question, and still is, if this particular sow killed Wallace (the first person).
It’s DNA was found at the scene on Wallace along with the DNA of EIGHT OTHER BEARS.
There was no indication given that this sow did anything to Wallace other than feed on his body - as did eight other bears.
Now are you suggesting that because one hiker got mauled and NINE bears fed on his body - that the Park Service should go out and kill NINE bears?