Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ozzymandus
So ... only because an emotional jury overturned the previous verdict which was based on facts, you believe that means it was a right and just decision?!

So in your world, 'White Bronco' OJ and 'Let's Party' Casey Anthony are innocent too?

71 posted on 10/03/2011 1:20:48 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Servant of the Cross

The first conviction was not based on facts.


72 posted on 10/03/2011 1:22:22 PM PDT by Chandalier (You say Obama, I say O-blame-o!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross

Facts? You must be joking.


75 posted on 10/03/2011 1:27:24 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross

You’re getting pretty desperate when you have to accuse me of supporting Casey Anthony and OJ. Maybe you should apologize to me and stop smearing. Or just keep burning those crosses.


76 posted on 10/03/2011 1:28:37 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross

“only because an emotional jury overturned the previous verdict which was based on facts”

You have it backwards. The original conviction was based on no evidence, and the second verdict based on that lack of evidence.


92 posted on 10/03/2011 2:12:12 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson