My problem with your statement (and Erick's) is you are too smart to know it's true. No, I mean really, you can’t be making such a statement sincerely believing it to be true. You can read well, you doubtless understand the indeterminate nature of campaign decision making, and if you bothered to read the Ames interview at all, you know full well no firm commitments were made, nor could be made in such a fluid context.
Which raises the question, why would you be pushing a meme you cannot possibly believe yourself to be true? Could it be you want to actively mislead people with weaker reading and research skills? But if so, mislead them into what? Into thinking Palin isn't running? That not working, as the Palin hive is alive and well and looking to the primary filing deadlines just like everyone else.
Or is it just to use the FR platform to create a false impression of Sarah herself for the broader, undecided segment of the electorate? That won’t work either. The moment Palin enters the race, all bets are off. Some phony memes like this may carry some small residual effect for a while, but as we have seen with Palin, she is Teflon with these “false light” attacks, and they will all fade in the light of truth. From truth to liberty and from liberty to truth.
Which raises the question, why would you be pushing a meme you cannot possibly believe yourself to be true? Could it be you want to actively mislead people with weaker reading and research skills? But if so, mislead them into what? Into thinking Palin isn't running? That not working, as the Palin hive is alive and well and looking to the primary filing deadlines just like everyone else.
Or is it just to use the FR platform to create a false impression of Sarah herself for the broader, undecided segment of the electorate? That won’t work either. The moment Palin enters the race, all bets are off. Some phony memes like this may carry some small residual effect for a while, but as we have seen with Palin, she is Teflon with these “false light” attacks, and they will all fade in the light of truth. From truth to liberty and from liberty to truth.
There are numerous articles of a SP time frame of announcement to announce or not announce or not run,or to indeed run.Just because someone found one interview that said Sept. Oct. and others read (or saw the interview) that was more widely known;to say 'by the end of Sept.' (or some such language don't sue me)does not mean anyone has any ill intentions to create a false platform or impression of SP.
It is SP causing the misconceptions and confusion because she is all over the place and confusing as to what it is she may or not be doing.In which BTW: In this forum, We have been told by the supposed SP experts of her every move; that SP is doing this on purpose as it is a part of the plan to eliminate the MSM and GOP yet you somehow are now using a broad brush to paint ill intent of those that dare question when the already given theory is SP is doing this on purpose.