DiogenesLamp wrote: “It occurs to me that as the courts have become (through the infiltration of Liberal drones since Roosevelt) huge steaming piles of crap, that any lawyer arguing correct law is bound to do poorly.
“Roe v Wade, Kelo, et al tells me all I need to know about a system that needs to be disassembled and rebuilt correctly.”
Who would be a candidate for your new, correctly-rebuilt, Supreme Court? How about Mark Levin? He wrote a book about how the Supreme Court is destroying America, in fact that’s the subtitle. He’s a solid conservative and he has blasted the Roe and Kelo decisions. Ah, but Mark Levin thinks the Vattel-birther theory is crap.
Honestly? You haven’t criticized Obama once in an entire year?
Not even once?
You’re pulling my leg. You were just waiting for me to write this sort of post, so you could pop the link up there and prove me wrong.
Okay, I’ll play. Let’s see it. Post me the best link you have of you ripping into the marxist man-child, and making mincemeat of him and his sickening policies. I’m all eyes!
Even Jesus picked Judas.
A common thread among all the anti-Vattel conservative intellectuals is that their explanation of their position always seems to be:
"Shut Up! That's why!"
I consider that to be a weak argument.