Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Signalman

Ask Mr. Levin to explain Minor vs. Happersett (1874)


15 posted on 09/29/2011 8:58:15 AM PDT by cumbo78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: cumbo78
Ask Mr. Levin to explain Minor vs. Happersett (1874).

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts.

25 posted on 09/29/2011 9:06:19 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson