You are 100% correct. My mom once told me about two ladies who lived in her small West Virginia town when she was a child (pre-1920). Everyone knew they were lesbians, but they didn’t flaunt it, and they were just nice people otherwise. No one cared about what they did behind closed doors.
[ You are 100% correct. My mom once told me about two ladies who lived in her small West Virginia town when she was a child (pre-1920). Everyone knew they were lesbians, but they didnt flaunt it, and they were just nice people otherwise. No one cared about what they did behind closed doors. ]
Exactly 1000% correct. It is all about “common sense and common decency”. I have issues with straight people giving each other tonsil exams with their tounges in public.
Certain behavior is meant for the bedroom and certain behavior is meant for the bathroom. You don’t see people urinating and pooping in public like a bunch of wild animals do you? That is what separates us fromt he animals, of course libs and their “Social De-constructionism” would love nothing more that to revert us back to behaving like “animals in heat”.
In their quest for not being beaten / killed for how they behave in their bedrooms, the homosexual movement has become a self sustaining political movement that is now demanding the right to act uncivilized because they wish to stay in power after their inital goals have been accomplished. Much like Unions have done.
nice or not, wisdom dictates never to allow children around homosexuals. There is no positive or harmless. It is no different than a wife swapper house where such parties occur. It may be behind closed doors but it is still a negative.
Remember when a room mate was just a room mate?