Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: USMCWife6869

OK, that guy was ringleader. IIRC, the others involved with Vick turned states evidence and got lenient deals so the prosecutor could get a big prize convicting Vick.

Vick broke the law and was punished. All fine.

What I object to is the hatred, wishing him dead, etc. The thread stated 99.7% of Vick fans would like to kill dogs if they could get away with it? Just bizarre.

Also I object to people who react to animal deaths MORE strongly than to crimes against humans.

Finally, with all the abuse of animals, people and every other wrong in this World, I think those who bother to hate Michael Vick with such a passion are frankly attracted to his celebrity case just as much as his fans.

And yes, I think animals, unlike people, lack souls and I also think those that have no problem with hunting and slaughtering ofanimals by the zillions are misguided when they then decide they want to KILL someone over a dog.

To clarify further, touch my dog and you die. Hurting one’s own animal is not a crime I am ready to punish with imprisonment. And BTW Michael Vick was NOT imprisoned for dog killing.

Maybe not a fun position, but rational. IMHO


131 posted on 09/25/2011 7:53:04 PM PDT by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: Williams
Also I object to people who react to animal deaths MORE strongly than to crimes against humans.

Where on FR have you seen that?

And again, it isn't animal deaths, but animal CRUELTY that is objected to.

141 posted on 09/25/2011 11:37:57 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson