RE: Why debate a thief who has been banned for life from the securities industry? If you hadn’t put his article here, there wouldn’t be more than 50 people in the world who even read it.
Even if the writer was personally banned from the securities industry these arguments will still exist in one form or another. Arguments exist to be REFUTED regardless of who the person making the argument is. Let’s focus on the argument, not the person.
There is only one argument to be made.
Cut the spending first. Cut it all the way to 0 deficit. And do it in 3 years. Then we’ll talk about tax increases to generate a surplus to pay down the debt.
Not until. And you want some DoD cuts with that? No problem. We’ll cut civilian employees of DoD in blue states. How’s that feel?
Lots of people do not understand supply-side economics, whether they are felons or not. You shouldn’t run around expecting to get a serious debate whenever some dipwad posts a few sentences on the internet.
Knock yourself out. There’s a bum with a sign over by I45 that’s seen by 170,000 people a day. I’m more concerned with his sign than I am with this nobody. Besides the entire discussion is old and useless. Everybody already knows all the arguments.