Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gene Eric

Yeah, he’s in the next district over from me and has little choice but to be pro union. Personally I think he’s really working toward a run at Carl Levin’s senate seat in the future.

That said, McCotter would be good in debates. A great replacement for Huntsman.


6 posted on 09/18/2011 3:09:02 PM PDT by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a permanent Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek
Yeah, he’s in the next district over from me and has little choice but to be pro union.

That's a little like saying, "Yeah, well, Barbara Boxer is from liberal California and has little choice but to support insane leftist policies".

I mean, I could understand McCotter avoiding divisive votes on union issues. He could quietly just vote no on the most outrageous stuff they demand. But Thad McCotter voted FOR Card Check and was a SPONSOR of the $165 billion dollar union pension bailout.

I am all for voting for the most conservative candidate that can win in a given area. I appreciate the fact that someone representing a union district can't be a stalwart against union thuggery. But this McCotter actually voted in favor of stripping Americans of the their right to secret ballot union elections. Even George McGovern opposed that. And to actually SPONSOR a massive union pension bailout? That's just too much.

11 posted on 09/18/2011 3:16:56 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

>> That said, McCotter would be good in debates

Agreed. He’s brilliant.


29 posted on 09/18/2011 5:38:59 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been Redistributed. Here's your damn Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson