1 posted on
09/16/2011 12:05:29 PM PDT by
Signalman
To: Signalman
All your base are belong to us or something like that?
To: Signalman
Obama is still living in all hype of 2008
3 posted on
09/16/2011 12:10:31 PM PDT by
molson209
To: Signalman
Oh well. Time for some golf and ice cream!
5 posted on
09/16/2011 12:12:33 PM PDT by
albie
To: Signalman
I might begin to believe this when I see even one well-documented poll showing a current Republican candidate beating Obama next year. You can’t beat something with nothing.
6 posted on
09/16/2011 12:13:52 PM PDT by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: Signalman
Not according to Ras ole Dickie boy!! He’s surging back toward single digits. America loves a socialism :(
8 posted on
09/16/2011 12:15:42 PM PDT by
stevecmd
To: Signalman
Now he’ll REALLY play president. AF1 flights all over hell and back, flying friends all over the place and paying for their hotel, lavish parties with Hollywood stars and rap goons...wait a minute! Never mind.
9 posted on
09/16/2011 12:16:15 PM PDT by
albie
To: Signalman
It’s hard to believe that someone as arrogant, extreme left and incompetent as Barry is still beating every American running against him except for Mittens. (Rasmussen). This country is in big trouble.
10 posted on
09/16/2011 12:22:27 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Hey Mexico! Your poverty isn't America's problem.)
To: Signalman
Is little Dickie selling another book? Or does he just want us to send him money?
11 posted on
09/16/2011 12:28:35 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Signalman
Soon Barry will be able to just eat his waffle.
To: Signalman
Obama took only 2.5 years to spend the money Bush spent in 8, and now he has reached the level of popularity Bush had after 8 years, too. He is just faster, I guess.
17 posted on
09/16/2011 12:38:41 PM PDT by
Defiant
(Calling all citizens from all over the world, this is Captain America calling.)
To: Signalman
Toes hit one important point. The idea that as the top of the ticket fails it becomes easier for the opponent to recruit good candidates. In 2010 we lost a lot of seats in the house especially the Senate that we didn't need to because good candidates didn't get into the race. We had a lot of candidates with their hearts in the right place and their heads up their hindquarters. The Senate races in Delaware, California and Nevada come to mind immediately. Had we picked those up we would be at 50 now and the dems would need everyone in order to pass anything.
Of course the converse is also true. While we will find it easier to get good candidates into the race, the Dems are going to experience a rash of retirements. Just like in NY-9 they will find themselves with a bunch of poor candidates because the "A" list ones don't want to risk a loss on their record.
23 posted on
09/16/2011 1:23:19 PM PDT by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson