Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: icwhatudo
A distinction without a difference.

A religion is whatever I say it is. Any provision to the contrary is an establishment of religion and unconstitutional. So, if Gardasil is against my conscience, I don't need the say-so of no stinkin' medical professional.

3 posted on 09/12/2011 11:00:49 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cynwoody

“for reasons of conscience, including a religious belief”

vs

“conflicts with tenets and practices of the church or religious denomination of which the applicant is a member”

Seems pretty different to me. Not only do you have to be a “member” for that to work, it has to go against the “tenets and practices” of that particular church or denomination...otherwise find an Alaskan doc that says it will hurt you.


4 posted on 09/12/2011 11:07:46 PM PDT by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the constitution"-Obama official)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: cynwoody

“A distinction without a difference”

Not sure what you mean here. There is a big difference between the two. In TX you don’t need a Dr. to sign off, in AK you do.


5 posted on 09/12/2011 11:10:19 PM PDT by F1reEng1neRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson