I understand the situation.
(personally, I think that is a reprehensible situation, which has been corrected because of her, another mark on the plus side.)
That was not my point.
You know as well as I do, that 99 percent of voters are not well enough informed to understand that.
FCOL, look at the kerfluffle over the use of the term Ponzi Scheme by Perry, when it has been fairly common parlance on BOTH sides of the aisle over the years.
Which brings me back to, “we are doomed, why do we bother at all”.
I guess because we like the game, even though we know the dice are loaded.
Bachmann piling on with the Ponzi scheme criticism is a low for her. So sad.
One can recognize SS as the fraud that it is without necessarily being hostile to the elderly. She sees her campaign falling apart and decides to play the “they want to throw granny in the street” card.
And T-paw endorses Romney? What up with that?
Rush went through at least 25 quotes from other people of both parties saying the same thing about the Ponzi scheme that is Social Security. Another one of my pet peeves is when people mispronounce “social” when they put those two words together.