I cannot believe the asinine reasons the phone company is saying as to why they are not responsible for what their employee said!
I say the restaurant owner deserves every penny he is suing for. In fact, if I were on the jury, I would give the owner more than he is suing for. And the phone company should be responsible to pay separately for the restaurant's owner legal fees!
The title of this article says the restaurant was listed accidentally under ‘animal carcass removal’ which is not true. It was a deliberate listing by a rogue telephone company employee.
The restaurant should have foreseen that could have had negative consequences, so the restaurant is at least partly responsible for the damages, the publishing company said.
How in the world can the phone company argue this in court? What kind of lawyer does this phone company have representing them?
the(now hopefully ex)employee for the phone company has a few issues that need to be settled and the company itself needs to seriously re evaluate their policies
I had a yellow pages company forge contracts and send me bills - they’re capable of anything. No ethics.