Skip to comments.
Charles Lindbergh Won the Prize, but Did His Rival Get There First?
WSJ ^
| 06 Sept 2011
| SEBASTIAN MOFFETT
Posted on 09/06/2011 10:27:39 AM PDT by Palter
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
09/06/2011 10:27:42 AM PDT
by
Palter
To: Palter
Landing vs. “being on the ground” doesn’t enter into the terms of success?
2
posted on
09/06/2011 10:29:54 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Palter
I guess that would make Lindbergh the first to fly the Atlantic non-stop without dying.
3
posted on
09/06/2011 10:31:02 AM PDT
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: USNBandit
So if the Russians had sent a manned rocket to crash on the Moon........
4
posted on
09/06/2011 10:32:15 AM PDT
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: USNBandit
New York to Paris, not North America to Europe as that had already been done I believe by an Army team.
5
posted on
09/06/2011 10:33:56 AM PDT
by
nikos1121
(Stand up is hard if you're not funny.)
To: Paladin2
Any landing you walk away from is a success......... Oh...er as you were
6
posted on
09/06/2011 10:34:15 AM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
(New gets old. Steampunk is always cool)
To: Paladin2
Landing vs. being on the ground doesnt enter into the terms of success? It is my understanding that Landing is the hardest, and most important part of flying. It should have been a clue to the people who were asked to train the 9/11 pilots, when they gave no interest in learning how to land.
Quotes from pilots I have heard: - "Any flight you can walk away from is a successful one."
- "Well, we've cheated death again."
7
posted on
09/06/2011 10:35:45 AM PDT
by
tpmintx
(The people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who VOTE for a living.)
To: Palter
That does not count as a successful flight.
We could have had a man on the moon 6 years earlier if his survival was not an issue.
We have interstellar flight capability right now, if we don't care when or in what shape the passengers arrive.
8
posted on
09/06/2011 10:36:14 AM PDT
by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: Palter
Nungesser was a really fascinating individual. But he’s never going to get credit for beating Lindbergh. He failed the task.
9
posted on
09/06/2011 10:38:36 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
To: Palter
To: Palter
It only counts if you land. And “landing” means you survive the flight.
To: cuban leaf
Of course he landed in a marsh, with all the other frogs.
To: Palter
“So Mr. Nungesser and navigator François Coli...”
Francois Coli or also known as F. Coli. I wonder if he had a brother named E. Coli? LOL!
13
posted on
09/06/2011 10:45:15 AM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: tpmintx
A good landing is one you can walk away from.
A great landing is one in which you can use the airplane again!
14
posted on
09/06/2011 10:46:48 AM PDT
by
Redleg Duke
("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dryfus)
To: Palter
So, according to this Frenchman, arriving alive was not part of the challenge? Nice.
15
posted on
09/06/2011 10:52:22 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
To: Palter
Yes, the prize was for New York to Paris or the reverse, thus demonstrating a potential for regular transatlantic flights. Even considering Lindbergh’s troublesome political alignment in the late 30’s his kind of rugged individualism is just what this country needs now.
16
posted on
09/06/2011 10:53:18 AM PDT
by
Huskrrrr
To: USNBandit
You got it!
This Frenchman would say the U.S. was the SECOND country to land men on the moon.
17
posted on
09/06/2011 10:53:38 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
To: tpmintx
It always makes me nervous when the stews now suggest that "we will be on the ground soon" rather than "We'll be landing soon" near the conclusion of a commercial flight.
The lawyers must be involved in massaging the implied promise over the years.
18
posted on
09/06/2011 10:57:29 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Palter
Didn’t make it to NYC? Fail.
19
posted on
09/06/2011 10:58:28 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
To: Paladin2
I, for one, have never liked the “Terminating in (wherever)” announcement.
20
posted on
09/06/2011 11:00:13 AM PDT
by
tpmintx
(The people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who VOTE for a living.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson