We are usually not identical copies of each other. DNA is probably a far more complex chemical than we realize. There are probably super computers in there coded in a way we do not yet understand ~ and presumably they work in very small dimensions using quantum processes. What those processes might tap into is unknowable at present.
It is tempting to think DNA is linked to a great universal overmind ~ which enables it to not only be all things to all men, but also to be all men, all critters, all living things anywhere, under virtually all conditions.
Wow, that is profound.
"We are usually not identical copies of each other."
Wow, the pearls of wisdom just keep flowing.
"DNA is probably a far more complex chemical than we realize."
Oh my, you're getting close to my post #33.
"There are probably super computers in there coded in a way we do not yet understand ~ and presumably they work in very small dimensions using quantum processes. What those processes might tap into is unknowable at present."
And we all know that supercomputers design and program themselves.
"It is tempting to think DNA is linked to a great universal overmind ~ which enables it to not only be all things to all men, but also to be all men, all critters, all living things anywhere, under virtually all conditions."
People used to fixate on fossils, now it's DNA. In a few years it will be something else. All purported to 'support' evolution until the don't by which time 'science' is off to the next great thing which won't support evolution when it is fully understood either.
Yet 'science' never learns that the evidence doesn't support evolution because evolution is a philosophy supported by fallacy.
I’m just reading a book by Gilbert Ling which suggests that DNA is just a toolkit used by the cell which is actually the cytoplasm.