Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
(NOTE DNA researchers say it was a different gene than the modern gene for red hair, but the principle is the same ~ and there's a reason the saber toothed tigers are gone).

Is the fact that the red hair gene is different a new finding?

The first time I ever saw the proposition that Neanderthals and homo sapiens had interbred, part of the evidence presented was that both Neanderthals and modern humans have members with red hair. I'll admit that I was not convinced by the argument; it's completely possible for color pigments in different species to arise independently. (With the new genetic evidence, I'm still on the fence about the whole thing; if Neanderthals and homo sapiens were interbreeding, then they weren't different species.)

28 posted on 09/03/2011 7:25:53 AM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom
In England interspecies breeding happens all the time ~ they've even stopped trains to watch.

But, that's a different issue. There's NO REASON to think of the Neanderthal as a different species ~ more like a different "race" I am sure.

One hypothesis about how they survived the Northern climate during SEVERAL ice ages is that they had twins in every pregnancy. That kicked their reproductive rate up to match the need.

That probably gave them four active mammaries.

Again, we digress. I'm still POd at the dentist for busting through that bony plate the first time I had Novocaine. It hurt.

34 posted on 09/03/2011 7:32:27 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson