Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert357
“.....He concluded that there's no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else....”

Kind of says it all right there. The courts are about protecting those in power and the secrecy surrounding the President.

********

Does the statement above also apply to questions surrounding the Social Security card of the President's uncle Obama who was recently arrested in Massachusetts?

1. That is, while, according to the judge, there may not be any interest in the Social Security number of the Obama who happens to be the President of the United States, there certainly seems to a lot of interest in whether or not illegal immigrant Obama's Social Security card is genuine or fraudulent.

2. It may just be me, but I don't understand how a judge can reject a case just because, in his opinion, there is no real interest in determining whether President Obama's Social Security number is genuine or fraudulent, and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else....

3. I thought courts were set up to seek justice wherever the search led them.

4. I didn't realize that courts based their acceptance of criminal cases on the degree or amount of interest the public showed in such a case like a case involving Social Security fraud.

5. I didn't realize it was some type of popularity contest.

6. I don't care if a Social Security fraud case involves an illegal immigrant or the President of the United States, the courts should seek justice and the truth in both cases.

7. I bet that illegal immigrants who use fraudulent or stolen Social Security cards are smiling today, because they now feel that if the President of the United States is not going to be investigated as to whether or not he has a fraudulent Social Security card, then why would the courts waste their valuable time to investigate the fraudulent or stolen Social Security application of a lowly immigrant, legal or illegal?

8. Watergate and President Nixon:

"and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else...."”

9. Imagine if the judge had thrown out the Watergate case and said that he did so because "the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else...."”

10. President Nixon would not have been forced to resign, and the history of the United States might have been much more different than it is today.

11. Also, I didn't know that "the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else...." was more important than making sure that justice was served no matter how important the person being investigating was.

12. I didn't realize that the President of the United States was above the law.

13. If there is a serious question that the President of the United States used a stolen or fraudulent Social Security card, then it should be investigated to the fullest extent of the law.

64 posted on 08/30/2011 8:37:32 PM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: john mirse
<<<12. I didn't realize that the President of the United States was above the law.>>> Where was you when clinton was in office?
66 posted on 08/30/2011 8:42:23 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: john mirse

I’m curious. Let’s say that I file a civil suit against you in order to obtain your social security number. Would you have a problem with that? If not, why not?


67 posted on 08/30/2011 8:44:02 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: john mirse

“If there is a serious question that the President of the United States used a stolen or fraudulent Social Security card, [...]”

Aye, there’s the rub.


81 posted on 08/30/2011 11:48:34 PM PDT by BladeBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: john mirse; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; Bikkuri; Plummz; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

. . . . Begin at # 64 and read through # 80 .

Don't step in the SitePests.

82 posted on 08/31/2011 12:15:00 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson