Vaccines are either weakened-but-live diseases/viruses... or dead versions that the body's immune system fights off, thus teaching the immune system how to fight off the real deal if/when it comes.
So how is Thaliminide even relevant?
Whether the base element(s) of the chemical compound is initially derived from plants, bacteria, virus, or synthetic compounds including combinations of the above, really matters very little.
That was my polite answer to your “strawman argument” question.
If you are actually so stupid, as opposed to merely ignorant,to not see a connection between a vaccine impacting female reproductive organs, and a drug that does the same, both of which went to market with no long term studies done before they were made widely available, I can't possibly hope to sway your “opinion”, much less answer you question, if you do really have one.
Go ahead, inject your own daughter with an experimental chemical compound derived from a sexually transmitted virus, years before she is sexually active, in order to potentially “vaccinate” her from one form of cervical cancer.
Nothing could possibly go wrong, right?It's totally safe with no potentially serious consequences...just ask the manufacturers who will stand behind their product forever, or untill they eventually lose enough lawsuits to declare themselves financial bankrupt...but the damage is done, and can't be corrected. gogogodzilla, you can go straight to hell on my dime, before I ever allow you or your employer to use government edicts to experiment with my daughters generation future reproductive health.
So can Rick Perry.