Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Graewoulf

http://www.nsf.gov/oig/search/A09120086.pdf

Read page 3 of the report.

While basically no fraud was found, the conclusion does say, “There are several concerns raised about the quality of the statistical analysis techniques that were used in the Subject’s research.”


25 posted on 08/23/2011 8:15:58 PM PDT by bricks4all@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: bricks4all@aol.com

Thanks for the link. I did read it, thanks.

The last part of the definition of The Scientific Method requires that the proposed idea be tested.

My research documents that testing has largely been relegated to 1. the two-dimensional method of the Null Hypothesis, or 2. inference based on statistics.

Einstein said it best ( allow me to paraphrase here ) : one can find a lot of evidence for a theory to be correct, but it only takes one test to prove a theory wrong.

I’m from Missouri : Show me an example of a cause and effect test that can be duplicated by peers, worldwide. IF all these test produce the same results, then test the assumptions, variables, etc. in an independent manner.

Re-search the literature yourself and pretend that you are also from Missouri.

If you find just ONE valid cause and effect please be so kind as to send me the reference.


26 posted on 08/24/2011 6:26:37 AM PDT by Graewoulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson