Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gardencatz
And Reagan was 30 points down a week before the election. But I bet his internal polling said something different. Bet Sarah Palin’s does too.

Not true:

"Three weeks before the election, for example, TIME'S polling firm, Yankelovich, Skelly and White, produced a survey of 1,632 registered voters showing the race almost dead even, as did a private survey by Caddell. Two weeks later, a survey by CBS News and the New York Times showed about the same situation.

Some pollsters at that time, however, were getting results that showed a slight Reagan lead. ABC News-Harris surveys, for example, consistently gave Reagan a lead of a few points until the climactic last week of October. "

"Nation: Where the Polls Went Wrong", Time Magazine, 12/1/1980

Reagan was actually ahead of Carter after the GOP convention. From that point until the 2nd debate, the polling had them within a few points of each other, with the lead changing hands several times. But Carter was not ahead of Reagan by a 30-point margin after the early primaries.

74 posted on 08/20/2011 12:13:24 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative

Registered voters will produce vastly different polling results than likely voters. I’m unable to verify the information in the time magazine article because I get a message that says “not available on this server”. I don’t have a lot of trust in TIME so it would be helpful to see what they used as proof.

Cindie


78 posted on 08/20/2011 1:37:15 PM PDT by gardencatz (Proud mom US Marine! It can't always be someone else's son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson