Could this case come down to a definition between tax and penalty? Stay tuned sportfans. This is a big one.
To: american_steve
2 posted on
08/16/2011 7:29:57 AM PDT by
unkus
(Silence Is Consent)
To: american_steve
the interview raises some good points but the guy who argued the case in a lower court (being interviewed) is hard to understand. Strong NYC accent. Like trying to listen through Henry Kissinger’s German brogue. LOL
47 Days And FR Is Still Short Of Its Goal
Take FR Across The Finish Line
Click The Pic To Donate
5 posted on
08/16/2011 7:47:30 AM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
To: american_steve
He fought the law and the law won ...
6 posted on
08/16/2011 8:03:40 AM PDT by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: american_steve
The case is about FREEDOM ... and a notable prior case, about the 1798 Alien and Sedition acts, was over American FREEDOM of speech. The Federalists (today's democrats) wanted dissenting Republican (Our nation was formed as a Republic) speakers and writers imprisoned.
That story can be found at
http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h463.html
7 posted on
08/16/2011 8:13:09 AM PDT by
OldNavyVet
(One trillion days, at 365 days per year, is 2,739,726,027 years ... almost 3 billion years)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson