[Sudetenland]

Yep, his only goal was to stir up controversy. It was disappointing that it wasn’t until he got to Newt, that someone called him down on it. I would have felt much better about Bachmann, Pawlenty, and Romney if they had refused to take him up on it and thrown it back in his face.

[FerociousRabbit]

You are absolutely correct. Wallace wanted to stir up controversy and he did just that. What was discussed after the debate? Newt's smack down of Wallace and the playground sandbox squabble between Pawlenty and Bachmann. Has any attention been paid about the substantive answers given by the candidates to substantive questions? Too bad. Newt shined on substance. Cain and Santorum gave solid answers in most cases and the three of them showed they have solutions to the problems America faces. Whose solutions are best? No one knows. We are too busy discussing Wallace, FoxNews and Pawlenty pulling Bachmann's hair instead of which Republican candidate showed the ability to lead. Paragraphs are our friends but FR is not permitting me to include breaks at the moment!