Kevmo, I wouldn’t care if she thought it was a 2025 document. She could have said it was a 3009 document. IT DOESN’T MATTER! The FACT remains. It was NOT a forgery. It just wasn’t. And there was no way polarik could have claimed it was. BECAUSE IT WASN’T! But he SAID it was and used his *expertise* to PROVE it was. Now how in G-d’s name is that even possible?
Kevmo, I wouldn’t care if she thought it was a 2025 document. She could have said it was a 3009 document. IT DOESN’T MATTER! The FACT remains.
***Of course it does. If you present a document claiming to be one of the handwritten copies of the Declaration of Independence that our founders used, but it contains information that was only available from 1850 onwards, then it is VERY LIKELY to be a forgery, and whatever else you find in that document is going to affect your perspective towards it.
So, since you’re in ALL CAPS already, then I should say THAT IT DOES MATTER.
I asked for a link to where Polarik was discredited, and it turns out to be a thread that I was on. Your whole position is filled with horse manure. You can sculpt it to look like a snowman , paint it white and put a carrot in for a nose, but it’s still horse manure.