Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut

Hey, Cities can be named after people, Bridges can be named after people, even Mountains can be named after men like George Everest. Heck, COUNTRIES can be named after people ( e.g. Philippines was named after King Philip of Spain ).

Why not this particular Peak? What possible harm can there be?


9 posted on 08/09/2011 2:40:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Because Mt John Denver sounds stupid. :)

Actually, I don’t have a problem with it either, but I’d like to see Mt Denver rather than John Denver. Or even Deutschendorf Peak. I think the two names personalizes it too much.


21 posted on 08/09/2011 3:01:04 PM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Not saying there isn’t precedence, but I do think it is a bit too far, and I’m a fan.

BTW, I just found my t-shirt from one of his last shows on his last tour.

Of course, if it passes, then there might be a market for all my memorabilia.


28 posted on 08/09/2011 3:14:11 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost, but now am found; was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson