Replies

The less educated someone is the more likely they are to be a creationist.

I don't suppose that an education system that strictly teaches evolutionism has anything to do with that.

Geology reject a young Earth and the idea that major features that took millions of years to form...

You're confusing "geology" with "geologists". Evolutionist geologists reject a young earth, while creationist geologists reject a 4.5 billion year old earth.

Physics rejects a young Earth

Again, you're confusing "physics" with "physicists". Also, thermodynamics (entropy) is at odds with belief in an old earth. Should I say that evolutionists reject physics too?

Etc., etc., etc.

I'm not crying. Perhaps I was wrong. Perhaps you're simply confused.

It was the weak and sparce EVIDENCE that convinced me that the ToE was largely based on faith and conjecture. I didn't even know that there was any alternative since I was raised and educated through 16 years of the state education system. I was extremely disappointed in the meager evidence that supported the ToE, but thought that it was the only explaination. It wasn't until my late thirties that I even heard of creation science. That is when I was finally able to begin to leave behind the same kind if ingnorance that you so desperately cling to.

Once you accept that you are going to stick to what you believe to be revealed wisdom and nevermind any and all evidence you are no longer a physicist or geologist - just an apologist for Creationism.

Science is finding NATURAL explanations for NATURAL phenomena. It is the most productive means of gaining reliable information about the natural world that man has ever come upon.

Creationism is explaining natural phenomena through supernatural causes. It is absolutely useless and has produced nothing in terms of knowledge or application.

I doubt you could adequately explain to me the theory - few Creationists can. So the idea that your rejection is based on knowledge I find suspect at best.

In Science there is no alternative theory of evolution other than natural selection of genetic variation. No other scientific theory has explained all the evidence (MOUNTAINS of evidence - if you had ever been to a scientific library, which no doubt you have not, you would see rows after rows of journals with papers on the subject). Evolution through natural selection of genetic variation IS the only scientific explanation.

Ignorance is all creationists have. Ignorance and the delusion that they speak for or know and understand God. Crying about it doesn't help your case.

The more educated someone is the less likely they are to be a Creationist.

Here is the Testimony of a Scientist who believes the Bible. Creationism is ignorance.

Entropy is one of the arguments so stupid that even other Creationists advise you not to use it.

Perhaps you noticed the Sun coming up today? Did you notice that it added energy to ‘the system’?

I suppose you rejected an old Earth based upon evidence and your ‘knowledge’ of thermodynamics?

That is really really funny!

http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answers/topic/arguments-we-dont-use