Posted on 08/06/2011 2:34:05 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache
It is disturbing because when you're in her company you never know when she's going to spout off against republicans or in favor of obama. Then you have the choice to get into it with her or not...
It's best to avoid her.
In my case, she knows she made a mistake by voting for 0bama but won’t admit it. I have positioned myself where she can not defend 0bama because I will knock her down easily and she knows it. She used to defend 0bama but is now silent.
It irks the hell out of me that she won’t admit that he is a sonofabitch and she knows he is a sonofabitch.
Maybe these women aren’t twins after all. But they still have the liberal mental defect. They are not rational and in deep denial.
They don’t need to actually show up to vote. The Democrap roles are full of alternate voters — usually found in cemeteries. Also, union members are encouraged to vote early and often.
They don’t need to actually show up to vote. The Democrap roles are full of alternate voters — usually found in cemeteries. Also, union members are encouraged to vote early and often.
Obama’s gonna get 42% of the vote.
Enough for a landslide loss in a 2-way race.
Or a Clintonian plurality win in a 3-way race.
10 to 1 Obama is going to get some sort of Amnesty deal done before the year is over . Then he’ll be a shoe in .
When I'm around her, I realize what we're up against in this country. She does not fit the stereotype of a liberal, and in fact, lives a conservative lifestyle. In spite of all that, she is an out of control liberal who supports obamacare and thinks she knows more than anyone.
Her husband disagrees with her politics, and they have a tense relationship.
It’s very frustrating.
They seem to think themselves immune to the disaster they support.
The Republican candidate will probably be Romney because the Democrats will be a large share of Republican primary voters, having nt contest on their side. Romney will proceed to fight a spirited election but his “yes, but we can do it better” campaign will lose the election and probably decrease the Republican representation in Congress as conservatives stay home or spend the time stocking their cellars and inspecting rural and mountain property.
I've seen more Kerry/Edwards stickers around here too, which is funny. I even seen the occasional Hillary sticker. (Though there are still a number of BO 2008 stickers, I very rarely see one on a car in a commuter transit parking lot. These cars belong to working people and taxpayers.)
The other week I saw an Aubrey/Maturin '08 sticker (complete with sailing ship). It made me smile.
I’m afraid I have to agree with you.
Agree. Watch as Obama steals the election and makes himself President for Life, Bans the Hateful Tea Parties and Racist Republicans. Guns will be taken away for security and Sharia law will be enforced. Then comes the Civil War as Texas leaves the Union, joined by Red states. General Sarah Palin will lead Alaska out of the union, signing a treaty with Putin. Change—yes, Obama promised us that—and we will get it.
From little 3"X3" stickers in hidden places to big licence plate on the front bumper. There is a lot of discontent here north of Philthy.
Don’t beleive everything you read on the internet. Newt has a million fake tweeter followers, too. It is easy for these fools for jack up their image on social media.
That being said, it is not going to be totally easy to beat Obama with the press and all the tee vee entertainers working as his propaganda ministry again. I hope the radicals keep up the iron fist hysteria becasue that will help us out alot.
“>Think Nobody Is Going To Vote For Obama in 2012?<
Nobody sane enough...”
Obama will _easily_ win 40% of the popular vote in 2012. That’s without even trying too hard.
The actual numbers will probably be higher — at least 45%.
The “America” that elected Ron Reagan in 1980 and 1984 _doesn’t exist any more_. The changes have been as much demographic as anything else. The ever-increasing number of single-parent families, especially those headed by females, will have a lot to do with things.
What _will_ change the election winds in 2012 is how “the Euro-American” vote goes. Unless Obama can pull more than 45% of that, he’ll probably lose. If it tilts about 60% to the Republicans this time, they’ll win regardless of who they run as a candidate. From Romney (ugh) to Palin, it won’t matter.
I sense that all the flash-mobbin’ goin’ on isn’t helping Mr. Obama with the Euros.... :)
Just sayin’....
For all practical purposes, Obama has limitless campaign funding, not to mention his constant campaigning using the public coffers for travel and expenses.
No candidate, even with all we can muster, can compete with trillions in borrowing power and the continuous free ads from the press syncophants.
He has never left campaign mode, from day one. Every speech, every presence, every appearance has been a campaign speech.
The same or similar buzzwords, phrases, and psychological triggers continue to be used, and the same people are lapping it up.
Add in the willful misstatements of the press about Obama and those of us who oppose his policies and 2012 is no shoo-in.
Rather, it is and will be an uphill battle.
The press has been trying to bury the TEA party movement since day one, and will sieze on any opportunity to attack. The only innoculation against that is at the grass roots, for people to realize we have opposed the failed and failing policy of this administration since before Obama was sworn in, and that we offer clear alternatives.
The budget deal has not helped, in that the press is trying to blame the TEA party movement for the market reactions to the deal.
We've been predicting this insomuch as opposing raising debt limits without significant cuts obviously is like increasing credit card limits without changing spending habits--and no one has any faith in the alleged cuts, only new taxes.
With the success of this regime removing an unknown number of people from the tax rolls indirectly through layoffs, pay cuts, and other depredations caused by continuing and increased overregulation and the general destruction of our economy, the number of dependents who will call for more handouts (especially those off for a year or more) will increase, not diminish.
Continuing to present the Republican Party as the party of 'rich white men' (something the country-clubbers do little to refute) and the intensification of the class warfare meme will do little to help defeat incumbent Democrats and strong challengers, up to and including the White House.
We need to strike back at the 'rich white man' meme, most of us aren't so well heeled.
We need to strike further at the developing meme of 'they're so greedy they won't hire people' as well.
Few in their right mind, unless they have an oilfield service company, are hanging out signs for help wanted, especially with the onus of Obamacare looming (something conspicuously unmentioned in the cooked books environment of tallying economic and policy effects on the workforce). After years of assault on small (and large) business, the administration is misdirecting popular anger against the potential employer, rather than bear the frustration of the same people it has helped keep out of work through policy.
The outcomes have been predictable, and predicted for some time. There are no surprises, here, only the inexorable march of cause and effect, and the attempts of the administration and the MSM to lie about cause and effect.
The meme of 'class warfare' is becoming more a reality than a metaphor, with increasing flash mob and mob attacks, and there will likely be more of that as the media continue to incite violence by hammering that meme.
The media need to be held to account for their inflammatory rhetoric as well--people are being injured and will eventually be killed if this keeps up, either as victims or as the victims defend themselves from attack.
The hopeychangey administration of 'transparency' and 'unification' has been anything but--instead fomenting tension and fanning the flames of resentment along racial and economic lines, inciting demands that those who worked hard for what they have give it to others, often those others living far more opulent lifestyles than those they demand subsidy from.
Many who are approaching financial security have done so by living within their means, even if that meant smaller less lavishly appointed homes, used cars, and more utilitarian wardrobes, instead investing their money in their future and living modestly in the present.
For many, that means an absence of exotic vacations, if they took any vacation at all instead of spending 14 hour days building a business for their future and that of their posterity.
Now, the MSM would have those who would not lift anything heavier than their tongue believe they are entitled to a share of that posterity because they have little and those who have worked like slaves to provide for themselves allegedly have 'much'.
Yet, in the confiscatory nature of the redistribution of wealth, they would not only rob those who have labored for their sustenance, but they would rob others who would labor for theirs as well by consuming the resources which create jobs and opportunities for others who would work for their own future as well, all in the name of being "fair".
Typically, the Liberal definition of "fair" is anything but.
This needs to be emphasized, that the Orwellian nature of the "safety", "Fairness", "equality", "transparency", and "security" offered by the Obama regime is anything but what it is so deceivingly called.
If, and I predict that if our current course is maintained there will be, significant violent events come to pass, directed at those who have labored long and hard for their posessions, I pray those who are the targets of these events decisively defend all they have--including the lives and welfare of their families and neighborhoods--every bit as energetically as those who would take them attack.
Such incidents will be used against us all, without doubt, but it is better to suffer the lies of the press than lie beneath the soil, and when it occurs, we can only hope that the decisive defeat of mob tactics will give pause to any who might have considered such in the future.
You might as well be talking straight to me. I am one of those who knows Obama is a one-term wonder and will be tossed out on his chin in 2012.
It is STILL the economy, stupid! That “stupid” was in reference to Carville’s quote, not to your post.
The depression will be worse than today. Everybody knows somebody who is unemployed, who is living with others, who is raiding retirement accounts, who tapped social security early, etc. Many people are concerned about going to work tomorrow or next week only to be let go.
Obama has a core of socialist voters who are on the dole who will support him and any liberal Democrat for the rest of their voting days. Just as the conservatives will always vote far right for the rest of their voting days.
It is the moderates and wishy-washy middle that will decide this election, as they have decided the last several, and that moderate middle is terrified of losing their job or is on unemployment waiting to be hired.
Obama is toast. He is a one-term wonder. Now lets work on re-taking the Senate, which is a requirement to repealing Obama’s socialized medicine law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.